Jun 242009
 

…comes from the usually only slightly naughty Octopus Pie webcomic where, while creator Meredith Gran makes a cross-country migration (that will NOT be reflected in her Brooklyn-based comic, at least not at once), she has allowed far-naughtier webcomicker Erika Moen (not usually SFW) to do a guest comic in which she provided a collection of verb out with your noun outs” as declared by the various Octopus Pie characters.

I like the casual style of “hang out with your wang out”, the proud un-coolness of “nerd out with your bird out” and “geek out with your cheeks out” and the age-appropriate “lie down with your fly down (some of us are too old to rock out for very long)”. But I know there are other possibilities, and I wanted to test my own creativity with a little “out”-ing.

But all I could come up with was “a detective doing a stakeout with his snake out” before I essentially schlepped out with my pep out.

So I attempted some oddly-worded queries on several search engines… Yes, I did Bing out with my thing out, Google out with my kugel out, and Yahoo! out with my Yahoo! out.

And, not only am I really not very good at naughty punnery, now the secret databases where the search engines follow your every move have me labeled as a “punning prevert” (which I was trying to hide from them). Later on, when I was writing a response to a MetaFilter post about “Everything Is Terrible” by linking to a video of the Ray Stevens song “Everything Is Beautiful”, I stumbled upon a video for one of Stevens’ less serious songs, “The Streak”.

Now there was a true pioneer in verbing out with his noun out. Except he didn’t really Rock Out, it was more like he Country/Popped Out.

Anyway, at least Achewood is better than usual. I’m sorry, but when it gets into storylines like the recent time travel poncho thingy, it loses me. But in its most recent strip, when Chris Onstad used all of his powers of weirdness on Facebook, it was a delight to behold. “It’s kind of like if the pictures in your high school yearbook came alive and went bald and said sorry.” Best. Definition. Ever. And the COURTESY NOTICES. If there isn’t a Facebook group called “I Have Died” (and I am never getting deep enough into that swamp to find out), there certainly should be.

And then there is the ongoing saga of fantasy, absurdity and clever wordplay that is simply titled Goats, where new chapters have been fewer and farther between as the webcomicker is busy dealing with the dead-tree/living-color edition of his earlier work, yet it is so worth waiting for every new moment in the Ultraweapons Trade Benevolence Private Weaponyards on Galactron Cortex with the Ultimate Computational Weapon, the Lolcat Memebomb, that can “Rickroll an entire level of existence into submission”. Awesomeness.

One other thing worth noting in the Wonderful Web of Wit and Whimsy: the demotivating minds at Despair.com is doing another caption contest, this time using a picture of two dandelions, one of which has only a single spore left standing.dandyAnd unlike previous contestings, it’s allowing the unwashed masses to rate the entries… it’s things like these that help reassure me that I AM an above-average writer of the funny, because some of these are deeply, deeply awful. Why did this picture inspire so many to make Bald jokes? (Forget I asked; I know) And some of the typos just make the lines better (“The looser takes it all”). And so many references to wind… most of them rather windbaggy. Some of the contributors forgot to include the humor in the black humor (and internet writing contests are not good places to make your cry for help). And then there are some very good turns of phrase that have only the slightest connection with the picture! (“Standing firm against the currents of change invites the lawnmower of destruction.”) Or none at all… (“When being sized up for the promotion, there was always a chance they were not going to go with tenure, experience, and knowledge. Just a chance.”) I submitted a couple myself, but I cannot remember them. Which means I probably voted against them. But I know they didn’t have anything to do with baldness or the wind!

Still, it does my heart good to see an entry like:
WIT
Wishing for it isn’t going to make up for your abundancy of not funny

And knowing it can’t POSSIBLY be referring to me!

Jun 232009
 

Speaking of Bumper Stickers, the late semi-great site EyeWire.com (since fully absorbed into the commercial site Fonts.com), did a feature once in which it presented a number of “Typographically Topical” Bumper Stickers (saved for posterity by archive.org). Of course, these “sticker” designs are not terribly good for placing on cars, nor for adorning web pages like the Internet Bumper Stickers (unless your site is typography-themed… as one I am now developing will be). Still, they offer some entertaining in-jokes for the type-obsessed, and since the viewing interface within the archive site is kind of … how shall I put it? … crappy, I have ‘rescued’ what I considered the best of the still-accessible designs and place them below. Just part of my policy of “Claiming to Provide Some Kind of Service While Letting Somebody Else Write All the Jokes”…

bumpers-011
bumpers-002
bumpers-003
bumpers-014
bumpers-008
bumpers-012
bumpers-013
bumpers-015
bumpers-016
bumpers-017
bumpers-007
bumpers-018

Jun 222009
 

“This is why we can’t have nice things.”

It’s an oft-repeated cliché on the Web, especially at MetaFilter, where many members worry about whether they actually deserve “nice things”. Honestly, I find “nice things” are somewhat overrated (and I’m looking at you, Apple). I have an adequate supply of adequate things that do what I want them to do… adequately. Of course, one of the things that my adequate things do is to help me make things… and if I’m doing a really good job, the things I make are “nice” and nobody better tell ME they’re overrated. Because the difference between “having nice things” and “making nice things” is immense. Think about it.

Also, “nice people” are definitely NOT overrated, but I’m not comfortable with the wording “having nice people”. “Having nice people around,” much better.

Jun 222009
 

In what has to be the biggest mistake in a ‘minor’ rebranding since the SciFi announced it was becoming the SyFy,
scifisyfyfofumthe folks at Yum! Brands (the ! is part of the company name), the same people who have been trying to make you forget that KFC stands for Kentucky Fried Chicken for over a decade, is now bringing you “The Hut”.
hut
Yes, it’s Pizza Hut, but no, they’re not changing everything as they are reassuring the world in a hastily-written press release

Pizza Hut Name To Stay The Same
Company Issues Statement Addressing Its Brand

Dallas, TX (June 20, 2009) — “Pizza Hut is not changing its name. We are proud of our name and heritage and will continue to be Pizza Hut. We do use ‘The Hut’ in some of our marketing efforts,” said Brian Niccol, CMO, Pizza Hut, Inc.

“To the loyal fans of Pizza Hut and pizza lovers around the world, we’re happy to tell you that nothing is changing, we’re still Pizza Hut, America’s Favorite Pizza.”

Well, that’s good to know. But why did they need to make this “what do mean I have to interrupt my weekend?” announcement? Because without any prior notice, people around the country were getting their pizzas delivered in boxes that said “The Hut”.
hutbox(photo thanx to Omar G., who first brought this to my attention)

The news had already gotten out to some via Business News and Snark-Based Media that the plan was to ‘reposition’ the Huts with eat-in facilities as ‘hip hangouts.’ Okay, but why then, did they change the delivery boxes first? Why did they change the delivery boxes at all???

That isn’t the only miscalculation that the Pizza Hut people are making. One of the key elements of the ‘hip-ifying’ of the Huts is adding televisions showing exclusive content to the captive pizza eaters. Okay, that might work, but the content provider they’re working with is CBS, probably the least ‘hip’ media megacorp there is, since they split the company and sent everything appealing to the under-40 demographic to Viacom Inc. In fact, they’re bragging that HutTV (as they inevitably call it) will feature “programs such as ‘Wheel of Fortune’ and ‘Entertainment Tonight’.” And, as shown on a publicity screenshot for the feature, Katie Couric.
87254-HutTVKatie hasn’t been hip since before her broadcast colonoscopy. (Sorry.)

Of course, there is one reason, above all others, that rebranding any part of Pizza Hut to ‘The Hut’ is a really stupid idea. And that came out with the premiere of “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” 29 years ago…
hutt

Right now, Mel Brooks is going “HA! You all groaned and smirked when I came up with the ‘Pizza the Hutt’ character in “Spaceballs”! So who’s groaning and smirking now!!!” (come on, that’s exactly the way Brooks would say it, right?)

Jun 212009
 

First, a note about my last post: the last line about not having slept for 88 hours was a JOKE, but soon after I wrote it, I fell asleep and slept, with minimal interruption, for over 14 hours, waking with memories of bits of three separate dreams, and what I remembered was NOT scenery, NOT architecture. Let’s just say I finally made the team in one, got the robot working in another, and saved a TV series in another. It’s true what they say about bloggers, we really do write for ourselves, and this time it really helped. But you don’t care, and I don’t mind that you don’t.

A recent MetaFilter post (NOT by me) about a site selling “Moderate/Ambivalent/Nuanced” Bumper Stickers reminded me of the existence of Internet Bumper Stickers a site that designs little 250×40 pixel images to ‘stick’ on your site or email. I know they go back to the previous millennium (their “retired stickers” collection refers to Bill Clinton, JarJar and Y2K), and have accumulated nearly 4000 designs. They’re an ‘equal opportunity annoyer’ which means they try to cover all the reasonable opinions and some of the unreasonable ones, while keeping the language PG (but some of the entendres do double).

I just wanted to take this occasion to display some of my favorites (since this blog is not formatted for 250-pixel graphics in the sidebars):
1st_annvsry_year_ago
2people_same_book
abwot
accusing_torture
ability2quote
act_loco
against_protest
all_your_base_acid
atheism_insult
ashamed_klondike
aweso
bad_analogy_screwdriver
become_editor
blog_hamsters
bodyfiction
can_worms
cant_fit(if you disagree with this one, they do have another with the opposite opinion)fits
godzilla
cola_wars
colt
comfort_the_disturb
comm_64
craptastic_blog
cynical_nvr_enuf
defrag_brain(my apologies; this one is hard to decipher, MUCH harder if you’re colorblind – hint, hint)
dies_last
do_not_follow
elect
great_thinkrs_blog
history
i_in_pie
inspector(okay, that one is less a sticker than a tag)

ironic_sticker
internet_badhair
know_how
librarian
life_not_being
lincoln_party
logic_dishonesty

I could go on and on (and maybe someday I will) but they have rules, and to show off as many as I’m showing right now requires me to say “Internet Bumper Sticker® is a registered trademark of InternetBumperStickers.com.”

Their content is sorted into semi-logical categories from Admonitions and Affirmations to Personal Issues and Political Issues, as well as a section containing Latin translations of contemporary stuff:
latin25(Garbage in, garbage out)
latin19(What me worry?)
And a section of Oxymorons that specifically excludes “Jumbo Shrimp” as lacking ‘attitude’.
oxymoron097(although that one is just logical, isn’t it?)

Since the days when I visited the site more often, they have monetized their Bumper Sticker Wisdom by putting some of the most popular and/or original on physical stickers for sale (as well as Refrigerator Magnets and, inevitably, T-Shirts).

One more thing they have is MUCH LARGER images for use as desktop wallpaper. My favorite (which has been on my current computer on multiple occasions (and multiple computers):
u_r_here_tn
And there you are.

Jun 182009
 

I was so thoroughly delighted that my participation in Neatorama’s recent “Mystery Sale” netted me a copy of Adam Koford’s “The Laugh Out Loud Cats Sell Out”

Ooops. Wrong sell-outs.

That’s more like it. I thoroughly enjoy this ingeniously funny series, having evolved from its original concept of mashing-up LOLcat-speak with the comic strip style of 90 years earlier to a multi-layered delight of now-extinct hobo lore and other anachronisms, two well-fleshed-out hobo cat characters and their relationship, skillful visual humor and punmanship, and comical cultural references from all over, but I didn’t start keeping up with it until Koford made it the main focus of his blog partly because, well, Flickr still feels to me too much like somebody’s vacation slide show to enjoy a serious portfolio or archive of works.

Anyway, I was thoroughly enjoying the printed collection, containing many Laugh-Out-Loud-Cats comics I had never seen before, until I stumbled onto one in particular:
LOLbeforeZod

It seemed strangely familiar, like something I had seen before… or something I had DONE before.
neil_before_zod.jpg

Yes, “Neil Before Zod”, “My Geekiest Pun Ever”, posted May 9, 2007, and one of the few pieces of ‘PhotoSlop’ I have done that ever got any outside attention, prompting me to place a little watermark sig on the bottom right corner. And Koford uploaded his “Neil Before Zod” to Flickr on October 4, 2007. I definitely have first (or at least earlier) dibs on the pun. Yet, while it was the same pun, we did it as different jokes, me pointing out that Neil Armstrong got to the moon (Apollo 11, July 21, 1969) well before General Zod (“Superman II”, premiered June 19, 1981), while Adam was having fun with alphabetical order, in which General Zod is always the loser. I mean, even Wendell Wittler is before Zod! And I’m used to being at the end of the line; my spelling of Wittler is even after Whittler. At least I’m Alpha before Wolfram. And his choice of Neil Gaiman as the Neil Before Zod was interesting. Nobody would recognize a cartoon representation of Neil Armstrong, but recognizing Gaiman is kind of a Geek thing, and that cartoon is one of many examples of the Laugh Out Loud Cats “Geeking Out”. What other Neil could he have used? Simon? Young? Diamond? Peart? Sedaka? (why are most of the famous Neils in pop music?) Patrick Harris? (We both did our things before Dr. Horrible hit the scene, but that might make an even funnier graphic image)

Anyway, I’m not going to take any action over this maybe seemingly semi-plagiarism except to use the Laugh Out Loud Cats in one or more of my future “Square Root of Minus Garfield” contributions – because Garfield is more often an “Am I Supposed to Laugh at That? Cat”. Or Mr. Koford could draw a “Wendell-bo” in one of his cartoons (no superhero suit please, I usually wear a polo shirt or webcomic-design tshirt and plain slacks). Hint, hint.

BTW, that Who album is kind of cool in its own way, between its reminder that, in other parts of the English-speaking world “Heinz Meanz Beanz” more than Ketchup and containing one of my favorite Who songs “I Can See for Miles O’Brien” (Go ahead Koford, use that pun in a cartoon, I dare ya!)

ADDENDUM: Too late, I did it myself.
seeformiles

Jun 172009
 

Excuse me, this may be a massively stupid question, but did I fail to blog about it when Square Root of Minus Garfield used another one of my submissions a-couple-or-three weeks ago? Why, yes, I apparently did.

garfieldsnoopy

The title “Garfield’s Other Dog” was not the title I suggested, but I can’t remember what, if anything, I did suggest and can’t find the email I sent them, so it couldn’t have been much better. There will be future Wendell creations in that venue in the future, some-but-not-all involving comic strip crossovers, which other Square Root contributors never seem to do. And there are so many other cats and dogs in the paper AND web comics…

But not soon, since the backlog of contributions for that comic is longer than the waiting list for Price Is Right tickets (the audience is still filled with people who made requests when Bob Barker was on… and had black hair), and that project’s Big Kahuna’s better-known project Irregular Webcomic is also made several years in advance. (He should be getting around to his Y2K-themed comics next week) I keed, I keed, but it does help me be less impatient with webcomickers whose Monday comics are posted at 3PM Tuesday. Which reminds me, is Goats up yet?

Jun 172009
 

The Doors. Craigslist. Only Weird Al could bring them together… or want to.

“I thought it would be anachronistically weird to have me as Jim Morrison screaming about Craigslist,” Yankovic told Spinner. “That just seemed so completely wrong that I thought I had to do it.”

Buy the mp3 here.

If loving Weird Al doing a Jim Morrison impersonation singing about craigslist.org while Ray Manzarek plays the keyboard is wrong, I don’t want to be right. Is this the first time he got someone who was part of what he’s parodying to participate in his parody? I should know this. I saw Weird Al live on his last tour at the concert hall at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, where he recorded his first couple hits at the campus radio station… in the men’s room (either the serious radio people threw him out or he was going for certain acoustics – there are conflicting stories).

Jun 172009
 

(as seen on MetaFilter)

Is there a question you’ve always wanted to ask about writing TV sitcoms? (Besides "Why bother?") Ask Ken Levine, the only living blogger and twitterer who has written for M*A*S*H, Cheers and The Simpsons (back when it was good), done baseball play-by-play for 3 Major League teams (and currently does the official DodgerTalk radio show), met Rush Limbaugh (when he was goodless awful), was once a disc jockey using the on-air alias "Beaver Cleaver" and had nothing whatsoever to do with the video game Bioshock. He’s collecting the questions for a “free teleseminar”, which is nice because he usually charges up the wazoo for seminars and based on everything I’ve seen, he’s worth it. Also, even if you HATE Twitter with every bone in your body, click the link at “twitterer” anyway and you’ll be pleasantly surprised.

Oh, and for MetaFilter I titled this “Why wasn’t there ever an episode of Cheers where everybody couldn’t remember anybody’s name? That would’ve been hilarious!” but I couldn’t use that here because of the way my titles are formatted.